Pocketstudio'z log

---　誰でもお気軽にコメントやトラックバック下さい。お待ちしております(^_^ゞ　---

/// English ///

It is employment of Japan that I expresses the opinion. There is a problem for the system of
employment and the tax system according to an increase of the permanent part-timer.

...

It is a Children's Day today. Is the reason for becoming the day when it thinks about the small Co making Children's Day = problem that the nature recently? It has misgivings of cause a decrease of a social layer that pays a tax as a result of the society with fewer children, and cause the collapse of the social security based on the government pension plan. There is a word that makes a set together with the falling birthrate and is derived today. It is a permanent part-timer.

"Increase of permanent part-timer". Yearly, I think that it becomes one spelling and the appearing thing has increased to the topic in the newspaper with the falling birthrate and aging society. For instance, young unemployment is taken up in the program of NHK(http://www.nhk.or.jp/bsdebate/0311/data5.html).

I think that it can summarize it by indicating the problem as follows.
1. The permanent part-timer has the pay gap compared with the regular member. It is remarkable. rise the age
2. The permanent part-timer is in the increasing tendency every year. One person in about five people is a permanent part-timer in 2001.
3. The pay gap society appears in Japan when the number of permanent part-timers keeps increasing.
4. When result and young "Relief measure for the unemployed" are problems, it is often caught generally.

However, is this view really correct? There was a program to ask permanent part-timer's right or wrong by the discussion program of NHK. How does they, women who spend it in the future as a permanent part-timer, become it in that?There was a topic.

It is rampancy of the feelings theory that it is anxious. It is an idea that it is at the consequence of its deeds that embarrasses because it grows old because it lived easily as a permanent part-timer now to put it briefly.

I could not help inclining its neck though there was being made remarks equally in
the television. Why?

It is only a usual guess when ending by this. I wonder the root of the problem whether is neither a labor cost nor a tax system to the desire. It is possible to employ it by corporate employing the permanent part-timer by "Cheap labor cost". As a result, the enterprise is holding the doubt that the constitution of fast profits can be maintained. Expend an untouched social insurance premium and expend the enterprise if you employ it by the regular member. However, it ends even if only the pay of the hourly wage conversion is provided if it is a permanent part-timer (And, work part-time). It can be said that the permanent part-timer is necessary talent for the enterprise to invent the high earnings constitution in a word.

Isn't it dangerous to consider the permanent part-timer as a mere worker? Do not you connect with the admission of the proletarian class society? = permanent part-timer has seeming the worker the worker and the idea called it seems to be a permanent part-timer. It doesn't come to think going unmentioned of an interpretation "drip death".. selfish because the social insurance premium is not paid ..the self-responsibility it.. as an extreme story and the permanent part-timer.

Let's think from another aspect. To attempt the escape from idealism,
Constitution of Japan is mentioned.

As for Japan, the residence, the move, and the freedom to choose one's occupation have been secured by Article 22 of the constitution. What you may do in a word. It is free. Any occupation is acceptable. Work need not be belittled even in case of the title that is called a permanent part-timer. The constitution guarantees freedom.

Moreover, it is in Article 25 clause 2 , saying that "The country should try to improve and to improve social welfare, the social security, and public health of all the life aspects".

In a word, the layer where the social insurance premium (contained national health insurance) cannot be paid by the number of permanent part-timers increasing as a real problem is correct and increasing is correct. Therefore, when there is danger to which a social system of Japan collapses due to the insurance nonpayment etc.

I think that it should make the system that can impartially pay the tax and the social insurance premium though the permanent part-timer is done if it is so.

Does not the thing that the social security can be covered not be a problem and become it in case of the mechanism that taxes can be automatically paid though the permanent part-timer is done either?For instance, if the enterprise is related to the permanent part-timer, it is thing to obligate the application of social insurance to the permanent part-timer as well as a general employee (regular member). The social insurance premium will be automatically subtracted in the part-time job fee, and even the permanent part-timer is automatically splendid taxpayer barrel division if it puts it and.

Japan is a country where freedom was secured. Isn't there freedom that chooses the permanent part-timer you may be either?The permanent part-timer is working though it is a problem that doesn't work at all. It contributes to the society.

Japan came to be able to enjoy today's prosperity by accomplishing high economic growth after the war. In the situation with only the scorch field in one side before, do it work and wasn't there tacit knowledge of the society named natural?Its working in today's Heisei era panic that passes burst of the economic bubble thinks that the virtue tacit light consent goes unmentioned. Because Japan enjoys peace, and became a rich country that can live as a permanent part-timer thanks to old people.

It is not because "The permanent part-timer's existence" is a problem. Are not you only because the enterprise and the country do not try to admit "New work form of permanent part-timer" straight?

To begin with, I do not think that it is strange that the composition with cheap permanent part-timer = labor cost consists. I should not be the same the content of work, and pay the salary only of the same to a general employee and the permanent part-timer?

I think that the country should give some measures (At present, it has not understood what is appropriate yet) on the social pay-off and the tax system side that corresponds to it if the permanent part-timer is admitted. It suited in the age, and I think that it should install a new, some systems and advance social management. Anyway, it is necessary to change only the current state of which the diagram "Permanent part-timer = easily labor cost" consists. We company director, country, and each one.

Japan will violate 60 years ago and the same errors again as long as it doesn't do so. An economical defeat will be this time received similarly to the defeat rushing into the war because of the idealism before if not dealing staring at the reality. Geting back doesn't adhere when becoming it so.